Weaknesses in two RFID authentication protocols

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-18681-8_13MaRDI QIDQ2947080zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Noureddine Chikouche, Foudil Cherif, Pierre-Louis Cayrel, Mohamed Benmohammed

Publication date 21 September 2015

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18681-8_13

zbMATH Keywords

authentication protocoldesynchronization attackMcEliece cryptosystemRFIDtraceability attack

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Authentication, digital signatures and secret sharing (94A62)

Recommendations

• Weaknesses in two recent lightweight RFID authentication protocols
• Two mutual authentication protocols based on zero-knowledge proofs for RFID systems
• A novel mutual authentication scheme based on quadratic residues for RFID systems
• Cryptanalysis of the Cho et al. protocol: a hash-based RFID tag mutual authentication protocol
• Weaknesses in a Recent Ultra-Lightweight RFID Authentication Protocol

Cites work

• Code-based cryptography
• Compact McEliece keys from Goppa codes
• Reducing Key Length of the McEliece Cryptosystem
• Semantic security for the McEliece cryptosystem without random oracles

Cited in

(7)

• Two mutual authentication protocols based on zero-knowledge proofs for RFID systems
• Cryptanalysis of the Cho et al. protocol: a hash-based RFID tag mutual authentication protocol
• Weaknesses in two recent lightweight RFID authentication protocols
• Addressing flaws in RFID authentication protocols
• Research on solutions for preventing algebraic attacks against biometric and RFID protocols
• Weaknesses in a Recent Ultra-Lightweight RFID Authentication Protocol
• A novel mutual authentication scheme based on quadratic residues for RFID systems

This page was built for publication: Weaknesses in two RFID authentication protocols

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2947080)