Why Extension-Based Proofs Fail
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A layered analysis of consensus
- A simple algorithmically reasoned characterization of wait-free computation (extended abstract)
- An axiomatic approach to computing the connectivity of synchronous and asynchronous systems
- An overview of synchronous message-passing and topology
- Atomic snapshots of shared memory
- Brief Announcement: Why Extension-Based Proofs Fail
- Counting-based impossibility proofs for renaming and set agreement
- Exponential lower bounds for the pigeonhole principle
- Generalized FLP impossibility result for t-resilient asynchronous computations
- Hardness of Distributed Optimization
- Immediate atomic snapshots and fast renaming
- Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process
- Impossibility results for distributed computing
- More \(choices\) allow more \(faults\): Set consensus problems in totally asynchronous systems
- New combinatorial topology bounds for renaming: the lower bound
- Revisionist simulations: a new approach to proving space lower bounds
- The Combinatorial Structure of Wait-Free Solvable Tasks
- The topological structure of asynchronous computability
- Tight bounds for k-set agreement
- Toward a Topological Characterization of Asynchronous Complexity
- Wait-Free k-Set Agreement is Impossible: The Topology of Public Knowledge
- Wait-free approximate agreement on graphs
- Why extension-based proofs fail
This page was built for publication: Why Extension-Based Proofs Fail
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6115415)