Why modern controllers can go unstable in practice

DOI10.2514/3.19884MaRDI QIDQ3695102zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors F. William Nesline, Paul Zarchan

Publication date 1984

Published in Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2514/3.19884

zbMATH Keywords

control system designsfrequency response

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Control of mechanical systems (70Q05) Sensitivity (robustness) (93B35) Synthesis problems (93B50) Control/observation systems governed by ordinary differential equations (93C15) Stabilization of systems by feedback (93D15)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 432632
• Instability analysis and improvement of robustness of adaptive control
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 42722
• On instability of control systems for a certain class of objects and methods of its elimination
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 53583

Cited in

(3)

• History-dependent modified sliding mode interception strategies with maximal capture zone
• Coning motion stability and decoupling methods analysis of spinning missiles with angle-of-attack feedback autopilot
• Combining passivity and classical frequency-domain methods: an insight into decentralised control

This page was built for publication: Why modern controllers can go unstable in practice

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3695102)