Strong versus weak quantum consequence operations (Q1194110): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3222894 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Reduced products of logical matrices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Equivalential logics. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Algebraic aspects of deduction theorems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Semantics of the minimal logic of quantum mechanics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Semantic analysis of orthologic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4342085 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quantum logics and Lindenbaum property / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Orthomodular Logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4750696 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The deduction theorem for quantum logic—some negative results / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An algebraic approach to non-classical logics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Matrix approach in methodology of sentential calculi / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:05, 16 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Strong versus weak quantum consequence operations
scientific article

    Statements

    Strong versus weak quantum consequence operations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 September 1992
    0 references
    The question of consequence operations determined by (classes of) ortholattices is considered. The two logics go back to \textit{R. Goldblatt} [J. Philos. Log. 3, 19-35 (1974; Zbl 0278.02023)] and \textit{G. Kalmbach} [Z. Math. Log. Grundlagen Math. 20, 395-406 (1974; Zbl 0373.02030)] respectively; the attributes `strong' and `weak' are due to \textit{M. L. Dalla Chiara} [Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, 427-469 (1985; Zbl 0603.03001)]. Here it is proved that some of the properties usually considered as desirable for a logic, force any strong orthologic to be classical; this result has no full counterparts for weak logics. The necessary preliminaries are carefully explained in the first half of the paper.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    algebraic semantics
    0 references
    equivalential logic
    0 references
    deduction theorem
    0 references
    logical matrix
    0 references
    consequence operations
    0 references
    ortholattices
    0 references