On the eliminability of ideal linguistic entities (Q916641): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5541333 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4175270 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3754604 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3783276 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5839915 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5829025 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Categorial languages and variable-binding operators / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Essays in logical semantics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3726090 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:52, 21 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the eliminability of ideal linguistic entities
scientific article

    Statements

    On the eliminability of ideal linguistic entities (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    By means of mathematical logic two axiomatic theories are constructed with reference to two ontologically opposed approaches to language syntax: nominalistic and platonic. Both theories of language syntax are formalized, bi-aspectual and in S. Leśniewski--K. Ajdukiewicz--H. Curry spirit of the theory of syntactic categories. The first one is based on postulating the existence of concretes of language and defines their abstractive constructs of language as classes of equiform concretes, while the other is founded on postulating the existence of abstractive constructs of language and defines concretes of language as their representatives. The paper proves that both approaches are equivalent, which seems to point to the advantage of the nominalistic one.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    ontologically opposed approaches to language syntax: nominalistic and platonic
    0 references
    syntactic categories
    0 references
    concretes of language
    0 references
    abstractive constructs of language
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references