Relational hidden variables and non-locality (Q1956376): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q592453
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Brian L. Burrows / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: Automath / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1502986101 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q57006474 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1007.2754 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A classification of hidden-variable properties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem: a proof with \(18\) vectors. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quantum analogues of Hardy's nonlocality paradox / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bell’s theorem without inequalities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5536167 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Elements of finite model theory. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quantum mysteries refined / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2706552 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quantum probability - quantum logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the computational complexity and geometry of the first-order theory of the reals. I: Introduction. Preliminaries. The geometry of semi-algebraic sets. The decision problem for the existential theory of the reals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5807665 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:23, 6 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Relational hidden variables and non-locality
scientific article

    Statements

    Relational hidden variables and non-locality (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 June 2013
    0 references
    This paper develops a relational framework, rather than a probabilistic model, to discuss the problem of hidden variables and non-locality. The essential formalism is the form \[ e: M\times O \rightarrow \{ 0,1\} \] where \(M\) is the set of measurements on the system and \(O\) the set of outcomes. If the result is 1 for a combination then this is a possible event in the system. The notation e denotes empirical since the elements of the relation can be observed. To include hidden variables an object \[ h \subseteq M \times O \times \Lambda \] is considered where \( \Lambda \) is the set of hidden variables. The definition of e realising a model is that for any \( (m,o) \in e \) we can find \( \lambda \in \Lambda \) where \[ h(m,o,\lambda) =1 \] This is a brief summary of the formalism which may oversimplify it slightly. It is very elegant but perhaps Prof. \textit{J. S. Bell} may not have liked the term ``measurement'' to describe the elements of M. (see [``Against `measurement'''. NATO Sci. Ser. B, Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. 226, 17--31 (1990; \url{doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8771-8_3})]). The paper takes the reader through a range of results where probability models can be described by relational models. One interesting one is the Hardy paradox where it is shown that in a particular system non-locality must be present and the results cannot be explained by hidden variables [\textit{L. Hardy}, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, No. 11, 1665--1668 (1993; Zbl 0972.81522)]. In this paper, this is demonstrated using a relational model which provides a good example of the formalism: \[ M= M_{1} \times M_{2} = \{ (X_{1},Y_{1}),(X_{1},Y_{2}),(X_{2},Y_{1}),(X_{2},Y_{2}) \} \] \( X_{i}, Y_{i} \) being `measurements' on two quantities and the outcomes are described by \[ O = \{ (R,R),(R,G),(G,R),(G,G) \} . \] In the final discussion in the paper, the computational aspects are considered and it is shown that membership of the a class of hidden variables models is a NP problem.
    0 references
    quantum mechanics
    0 references
    non-locality
    0 references
    hidden variables
    0 references
    relational models
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references