Phases of Lagrangian-invariant objects in the derived category of an abelian variety (Q2017074): Difference between revisions

Derived categories \(\mathcal{D}^b(A)\) of abelian varieties \(A\) have seen a lot of interest starting with \textit{S. Mukai}'s [Nagoya Math. J. 81, 153--175 (1981; Zbl 0417.14036)] realisation that any abelian variety is derived equivalent to its dual \(\hat{A}\). Let us also mention \textit{D. Orlov}'s [Izv. Math. 66, No. 3, 569--594 (2002; Zbl 1031.18007); translation from Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Mat. 66, No.3, 131-158 (2002)] description of the group of autoequivalences of \(\mathcal{D}^b(A)\). It is of interest to understand the space of Bridgeland stability conditions [\textit{T. Bridgeland}, Ann. Math. (2) 166, No. 2, 317--345 (2007; Zbl 1137.18008)] on \(\mathcal{D}^b(A)\). This article discusses the construction of phases of certain objects of \(\mathcal{D}^b(A)\) called Lagrangian-invariant for every element of the complexified ample cone of \(A\) which hypothetically coincide with the phases coming from Bridgeland stability conditions. If \(A\) is two-dimensional this is checked to be true. In case \(A = E \times \cdots \times E\) is just a power of an elliptic curve \(E\) the author shows that the phase functions he define have a natural interpretation in terms of the Fukaya category of the mirror partner of \(A\).