How to split gains and losses? Experimental evidence of dictator and ultimatum games (Q1712136): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: hroot / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/g9040078 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2895579400 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: From windfall sharing to property ownership: prosocial personality traits in giving and taking dictator games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Fairness in simple bargaining experiments / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4311884 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: BARGAINING OVER LOSSES / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Theory of mind and general intelligence in dictator and ultimatum games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Non-acceptance of Losses—An Experimental Study on the Importance of the Sign of Final Outcomes in Ultimatum Bargaining / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Asymmetric outside options in ultimatum bargaining: a systematic analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3997553 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 22:11, 17 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
How to split gains and losses? Experimental evidence of dictator and ultimatum games
scientific article

    Statements

    How to split gains and losses? Experimental evidence of dictator and ultimatum games (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    21 January 2019
    0 references
    Summary: Previous research has typically focused on distribution problems that emerge in the domain of gains. Only a few studies have distinguished between games played in the domain of gains from games in the domain of losses, even though, for example, prospect theory predicts differences between behavior in both domains. In this study, we experimentally analyze players' behavior in dictator and ultimatum games when they need to divide a monetary loss and then compare this to behavior when players have to divide a monetary gain. We find that players treat gains and losses differently in that they are less generous in games over losses and react differently to prior experiences. Players in the dictator game become more selfish after they have had the experience of playing an ultimatum game first.
    0 references
    dictator game
    0 references
    ultimatum game
    0 references
    gains
    0 references
    losses
    0 references
    equal split
    0 references
    experimental economics
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers