On \(R_ 0\) and \(R_ 1\) fuzzy topological spaces: A counterexample (Q803990): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q125020167, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711094041063
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Fuzzy neighborhood spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: \(R_ 1\) fuzzy topological spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On fuzzy \(T_ 0\) and \(R_ 0\) topological spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the determination of fuzzy topological spaces and fuzzy neighbourhood spaces by their level-topologies / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On local and global measures of separation in fuzzy topological spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247x(91)90065-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2058685663 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:18, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On \(R_ 0\) and \(R_ 1\) fuzzy topological spaces: A counterexample
scientific article

    Statements

    On \(R_ 0\) and \(R_ 1\) fuzzy topological spaces: A counterexample (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1991
    0 references
    \textit{A. K. Srivastava} introduced in this journal 127, 151-157 (1987; Zbl 0621.54004)] a notion of \(R_ 1\)-ness for fuzzy topological spaces, and claims in Theorem 3 that his property is initial. However, both the theorem and the proof are incorrect. The theorem is true for finite families but as will follow from the example given here, an infinite product of \(R_ 1\)-spaces need not even be \(R_ 0\). Also the counterexample 3.4 in the joint paper with \textit{R. Srivastava} and \textit{S. N. Lal}, ibid. 136, No.1, 66-73 (1988; see the preceding review) is incorrect.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references