On weak*-extensible Banach spaces (Q435063): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2012.04.008 / rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.NA.2012.04.008 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 9 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On weak*-extensible Banach spaces |
scientific article |
Statements
On weak*-extensible Banach spaces (English)
0 references
16 July 2012
0 references
According to \textit{B.~Wang}, \textit{Y.~Zhao} and \textit{W.~Qian} [Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl., Ser. A, Theory Methods 74, No. 6, 2109--2115 (2011; Zbl 1220.46012)], a Banach space \(X\) is weak*-extensible if for every subspace \(Y\), every weak*-null sequence \((f_n)\subset Y^*\) admits a subsequence \((f_m)\) which can be extended to a weak*-null sequence \((F_n)\subset X^*\). They posed the problem: Does a weak*-extensible space have a weak*-sequentially compact dual ball? In the paper under review the authors give partial answers to this problem. They also introduce and investigate a weaker notion of separable weak*-extensibility, taking in the previous definition only separable subspaces \(Y\). It turns out that separably weak*-extensible Banach spaces have the Gelfand-Phillips property although they do not necessarily have a weak*-sequentially compact dual ball.
0 references
weak*-sequentially compact dual ball
0 references
Banach spaces
0 references
Gelfand-Phillips property
0 references
extension of operators
0 references
0 references
0 references