On \(R_ 0\) and \(R_ 1\) fuzzy topological spaces: A counterexample (Q803990): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q125020167, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711094041063 |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Fuzzy neighborhood spaces / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: \(R_ 1\) fuzzy topological spaces / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On fuzzy \(T_ 0\) and \(R_ 0\) topological spaces / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the determination of fuzzy topological spaces and fuzzy neighbourhood spaces by their level-topologies / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On local and global measures of separation in fuzzy topological spaces / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 16:47, 21 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On \(R_ 0\) and \(R_ 1\) fuzzy topological spaces: A counterexample |
scientific article |
Statements
On \(R_ 0\) and \(R_ 1\) fuzzy topological spaces: A counterexample (English)
0 references
1991
0 references
\textit{A. K. Srivastava} introduced in this journal 127, 151-157 (1987; Zbl 0621.54004)] a notion of \(R_ 1\)-ness for fuzzy topological spaces, and claims in Theorem 3 that his property is initial. However, both the theorem and the proof are incorrect. The theorem is true for finite families but as will follow from the example given here, an infinite product of \(R_ 1\)-spaces need not even be \(R_ 0\). Also the counterexample 3.4 in the joint paper with \textit{R. Srivastava} and \textit{S. N. Lal}, ibid. 136, No.1, 66-73 (1988; see the preceding review) is incorrect.
0 references
0 references