Existence of invariant tori in three dimensional maps with degeneracy (Q441804): Difference between revisions

Consider the mapping \(M:(x,y,z)\mapsto (x_1,y_1,z_1)\) defined by \[ \begin{cases} x_1 = x + z + \epsilon X(x,y,z), \\ y_1 = y + \epsilon g_0(z) + \epsilon Y(x,y,z), \\ z_1 = z + \epsilon Z(x,y,z), \end{cases} \] for \(x,y \in [0, 2\pi)\) and \(z \in [a,b]\), and where \(X,Y\) and \(Z\) are real analytic functions, \(2\pi\)-periodic in \(x,y\), and the function \(g_0\) is analytic and satisfies \(|g_0| \leq 1\), \(g_0'' \geq c_1 >0\), and \(\epsilon > 0\) is a small parameter. Moreover, \(\int_0^{2\pi} Z dx =0\), and \(\int_0^{2\pi} Y dx\) could depend on \(z\) only and \(M\) satisfies the intersection property: for each torus \(z=\gamma (x,y)\), \(x,y \in [0,2\pi)\), \(M\) intersects its image. The authors establish the persistence of two--dimensional invariant tori in the perturbations of integrable action--angle--angle maps with a degenerate angle: { Theorem}. There exists a positive number \(\epsilon_0\), such that for all \(\epsilon \in (0,\epsilon_0)\) the mapping \(M\) admits a family of invariant tori \[ x = \xi + u(\xi,\zeta,\omega),\;y = \zeta + v(\xi,\zeta,\omega),\;z = w(\xi,\zeta,\omega), \] where \(u,v\) and \(w\) are real analytic functions of period \(2\pi\) in \(\xi,\zeta\), while \(\omega \in S_{\omega} \subset [a,b]\), \(S_{\omega}\) being a Cantor set with positive Lebesgue measure. The mapping can be parameterized so that the induced mapping on the tori is given by \(\xi_1=\xi+\omega\), \(\zeta_1=\zeta+\epsilon g_0(\omega)+g^*(\omega,\epsilon)\) with \(g^*(\omega,\epsilon)\) an analytic function, \(g^*(\omega,0)=0\). The first step of averaging coordinate transformation reduces all three perturbations to order \(\epsilon^2\). Next, a finite sequence of transformations reduces the action perturbations to order \(\epsilon^3\). At last, an infinite sequence of coordinate transformations finishes the proof of this classical KAM theorem. Let us note that some modifications of the proof technics (compared with the general KAM theory case) appear. Using computer simulations, the authors illustrate their theory with the swirling Hill's vortex with strong swirl \[ \begin{cases} \dot{r} = rz + \sqrt{2r} \sin\theta \,\sin\frac{t}{\epsilon} \\ \dot{z} = 1 - 2r^2 - z^2 - \frac{z}{\sqrt{2r}} \sin\theta\,\sin\frac{t}{\epsilon} \\ \dot{\theta} = \frac{2}{\epsilon r^2} + \sqrt{2r} \cos\theta \, \sin\frac{t}{\epsilon}. \end{cases} \] Rescale the time \(t=\epsilon\tau\), and change the cylindrical coordinates \((r,z,\theta)\) to action--angle--angle coordinates; then the Poincaré map corresponds to the mapping \(M\).