Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:557125
DOI10.1016/J.MCM.2004.10.003zbMath1066.90054OpenAlexW2147680910MaRDI QIDQ557125
Publication date: 23 June 2005
Published in: Mathematical and Computer Modelling (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003
Related Items (28)
Information entropy, continuous improvement, and US energy performance: a novel stochastic-entropic analysis for ideal solutions (SEA-IS) ⋮ Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: Interval efficiency ⋮ A comprehensive decision making structure for partitioning of make-to-order, make-to-stock and hybrid products ⋮ An avoiding information loss approach to group decision making ⋮ A note on DEA efficiency assessment using ideal point: an improvement of Wang and Luo's model ⋮ An evolutionary strategic weight manipulation approach for multi-attribute decision making: TOPSIS method ⋮ Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS ⋮ Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods ⋮ Ranking firms based on their financial and diversity performance using multiple‐stage unweighted TOPSIS ⋮ Comparison of macroeconomic performance of MENA countries with TOPSIS method ⋮ From MCDA to fuzzy MCDA: presumption of model adequacy or is every fuzzification of an mCDA method justified? ⋮ Enhancing The Discrimination of Alternatives in Fuzzy-Topsis ⋮ Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda ⋮ A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods ⋮ Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using a combined multiple attribute decision making method ⋮ A mathematical programming model to determine objective weights for the interval extension of TOPSIS ⋮ A novel intensive distribution logistics network design and profit allocation problem considering sharing economy ⋮ MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING APPROACH TO MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING UNDER INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ENVIRONMENTS ⋮ Measuring sustainable development in the education area using multi-criteria methods: a case study ⋮ Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS ⋮ An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making ⋮ A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index ⋮ An extreme-distance approach to multiple criteria ranking ⋮ Using genetic algorithm and TOPSIS technique for multiobjective transportation problem: a hybrid approach ⋮ A decision support system for multiple criteria alternative ranking using TOPSIS and VIKOR in fuzzy and nonfuzzy environments ⋮ On functions preserving products of certain classes of semimetric spaces ⋮ A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for selecting a sustainable supplier of forklift filters: a case study from the mining industry ⋮ Comparison of different multicriteria methods in selecting optimal biomechanical model parameters
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method
- Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. A state-of- the-art survey
- Implementation of the centroid method of Solymosi and Dombi
- A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
- Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
- A new approach for multiple objective decision making
- TOPSIS for MODM
- Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights
- A Reconciliation among Discrete Compromise Solutions
- On the equivalence of operational performance measurement and multiple attribute decision making
- Satisfaction assessment of multi-objective schedules using neural fuzzy methodology
- FACILITY LOCATION SELECTION USING FUZZY TOPSIS UNDER GROUP DECISIONS
- Comparison of three multicriteria methods to predict known outcomes
This page was built for publication: Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models
