On adaptive procedures controlling the familywise error rate
From MaRDI portal
Publication:643374
DOI10.1016/j.jspi.2011.06.022zbMath1368.62219OpenAlexW1974425616MaRDI QIDQ643374
Helmut Finner, Wenge Guo, Sanat Kumar Sarkar
Publication date: 28 October 2011
Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2011.06.022
Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Hypothesis testing in multivariate analysis (62H15) Robustness and adaptive procedures (parametric inference) (62F35) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)
Related Items
Controlling mixed directional false discovery rate in multidimensional decisions with applications to microarray studies ⋮ Bias-corrected estimators for proportion of true null hypotheses: application of adaptive FDR-controlling in segmented failure data ⋮ A powerful FDR control procedure for multiple hypotheses ⋮ Generalized FWER control procedures for testing multiple hypotheses ⋮ On improving some adaptive BH procedures controlling the FDR under dependence ⋮ Constructing confidence intervals for selected parameters ⋮ Dynamic adaptive multiple tests with finite sample FDR control ⋮ Adaptive FWER control procedure for grouped hypotheses ⋮ Bonferroni-type Plug-in Procedure Controlling Generalized Familywise Error Rate ⋮ Adaptive controls of FWER and FDR under block dependence
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- On methods controlling the false discovery rate
- Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling
- An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control under independence
- Some probability inequalities for ordered MTP\(_2\) random variables: a proof of the Simes conjecture
- Multiple hypotheses testing and expected number of type I errors
- False discovery and false nondiscovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures
- Adaptive FDR control under independence and dependence
- Multiple Comparisons
- Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
- A note on adaptive Bonferroni and Holm procedures under dependence
- A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
- The Simes Method for Multiple Hypothesis Testing With Positively Dependent Test Statistics
- Controlling the Familywise Error Rate with Plug-in Estimator for the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses
- Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
- An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
- Association of Random Variables, with Applications
- Comments on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling
