An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control under independence
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1020972
DOI10.1214/07-AOS586zbMath1162.62069arXiv0903.5373WikidataQ56622253 ScholiaQ56622253MaRDI QIDQ1020972
Yoav Benjamini, Yulia Gavrilov, Sanat Kumar Sarkar
Publication date: 4 June 2009
Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5373
Related Items
Minimally adaptive BH: A tiny but uniform improvement of the procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg, A Bottom-Up Approach to Testing Hypotheses That Have a Branching Tree Dependence Structure, With Error Rate Control, False Discovery Rate Control of Step-Up-Down Tests with Special Emphasis on the Asymptotically Optimal Rejection Curve, Multiple hypothesis tests based On conditional differences in means, Estimating the number of equal components for two high-dimensional mean vectors, Estimating minimum effect with outlier selection, On improving some adaptive BH procedures controlling the FDR under dependence, Estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiple hypothesis testing, Two new estimators for the proportion of true null hypotheses in multiple test, Comment: ``Microarrays, empirical Bayes and the two-groups model, Exact calculations for false discovery proportion with application to least favorable configura\-tions, Two simple sufficient conditions for FDR control, Optimal weighting for false discovery rate control, FDR control with adaptive procedures and FDR monotonicity, On adaptive procedures controlling the familywise error rate, Optimal rejection curves for exact false discovery rate control, False discovery rate control under Archimedean copula, Discovering the False Discovery Rate, Selective inference in complex research, Multiple Testing in a Two-Stage Adaptive Design With Combination Tests Controlling FDR, FDR control for pairwise comparisons of normal means based on goodness of fit test, Simultaneous high-probability bounds on the false discovery proportion in structured, regression and online settings, New FDR bounds for discrete and heterogeneous tests, Further results on controlling the false discovery proportion, On false discovery rate thresholding for classification under sparsity, A simple forward selection procedure based on false discovery rate control, Rejoinder on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling, On-line monitoring data quality of high-dimensional data streams, On the false discovery rate and an asymptotically optimal rejection curve, Comments on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling, Comments on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling, Some aspects of response variable selection and estimation in multivariate linear regression, Group sequential BH and its adaptive versions controlling the FDR, A unified treatment of multiple testing with prior knowledge using the p-filter, Inequalities for the false discovery rate (FDR) under dependence
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- On the false discovery rate and an asymptotically optimal rejection curve
- The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency.
- Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures.
- Adapting to unknown sparsity by controlling the false discovery rate
- Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
- Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
- A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
- Step-Up Multiple Testing of Parameters with Unequally Correlated Estimates
