An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control under independence
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1020972
DOI10.1214/07-AOS586zbMath1162.62069arXiv0903.5373WikidataQ56622253 ScholiaQ56622253MaRDI QIDQ1020972
Yoav Benjamini, Yulia Gavrilov, Sanat Kumar Sarkar
Publication date: 4 June 2009
Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5373
Related Items (35)
Minimally adaptive BH: A tiny but uniform improvement of the procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg ⋮ A Bottom-Up Approach to Testing Hypotheses That Have a Branching Tree Dependence Structure, With Error Rate Control ⋮ False Discovery Rate Control of Step-Up-Down Tests with Special Emphasis on the Asymptotically Optimal Rejection Curve ⋮ Multiple hypothesis tests based On conditional differences in means ⋮ Estimating the number of equal components for two high-dimensional mean vectors ⋮ Estimating minimum effect with outlier selection ⋮ On improving some adaptive BH procedures controlling the FDR under dependence ⋮ Estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiple hypothesis testing ⋮ Two new estimators for the proportion of true null hypotheses in multiple test ⋮ Comment: ``Microarrays, empirical Bayes and the two-groups model ⋮ Exact calculations for false discovery proportion with application to least favorable configura\-tions ⋮ Two simple sufficient conditions for FDR control ⋮ Optimal weighting for false discovery rate control ⋮ FDR control with adaptive procedures and FDR monotonicity ⋮ On adaptive procedures controlling the familywise error rate ⋮ Optimal rejection curves for exact false discovery rate control ⋮ False discovery rate control under Archimedean copula ⋮ Discovering the False Discovery Rate ⋮ Selective inference in complex research ⋮ Multiple Testing in a Two-Stage Adaptive Design With Combination Tests Controlling FDR ⋮ FDR control for pairwise comparisons of normal means based on goodness of fit test ⋮ Simultaneous high-probability bounds on the false discovery proportion in structured, regression and online settings ⋮ New FDR bounds for discrete and heterogeneous tests ⋮ Further results on controlling the false discovery proportion ⋮ On false discovery rate thresholding for classification under sparsity ⋮ A simple forward selection procedure based on false discovery rate control ⋮ Rejoinder on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling ⋮ On-line monitoring data quality of high-dimensional data streams ⋮ On the false discovery rate and an asymptotically optimal rejection curve ⋮ Comments on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling ⋮ Comments on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling ⋮ Some aspects of response variable selection and estimation in multivariate linear regression ⋮ Group sequential BH and its adaptive versions controlling the FDR ⋮ A unified treatment of multiple testing with prior knowledge using the p-filter ⋮ Inequalities for the false discovery rate (FDR) under dependence
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- On the false discovery rate and an asymptotically optimal rejection curve
- The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency.
- Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures.
- Adapting to unknown sparsity by controlling the false discovery rate
- Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
- Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
- A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
- Step-Up Multiple Testing of Parameters with Unequally Correlated Estimates
This page was built for publication: An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control under independence
