Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates

DOI10.1007/s11229-011-9964-yzbMath1284.03129OpenAlexW2055049967MaRDI QIDQ2441764

Dunja Šešelja, Christian Straßer

Publication date: 28 March 2014

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/17265/1/EAF-preprint.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

explanationabstract argumentationformal modelingscientific reasoningscientific debates

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Related Items (5)

A logic of knowing why ⋮ A Metamathematical Model for A/O Opposition in Scientific Inquiry ⋮ Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories ⋮ Abduction in argumentation frameworks ⋮ On searching explanatory argumentation graphs

Cites Work

• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Abductive reasoning. Logical investigations into discovery and explanation
• Audiences in argumentation frameworks
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• Explanation and argumentation capabilities: towards the creation of more persuasive agents
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Hierarchical Argumentation
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

This page was built for publication: Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates