Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument

DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXI058zbMath1113.03025OpenAlexW1982993548WikidataQ58168607 ScholiaQ58168607MaRDI QIDQ3371157

Katie Atkinson, Alison Chorley, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon

Publication date: 21 February 2006

Published in: Journal of Logic and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/da67e383740455b188e952e04400473232155e18

zbMATH Keywords

practical reasoningargumentation frameworkslegal reasoningargumentation schemescritical questionslegal theory construction

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Other applications of logic (03B80)

Related Items (9)

A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument ⋮ A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness ⋮ Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning ⋮ Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic ⋮ Constrained Value-Based Argumentation Framework ⋮ A formal account of Socratic-style argumentation ⋮ Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future ⋮ Audiences in argumentation frameworks ⋮ Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems

This page was built for publication: Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument