On quasi norm attaining operators between Banach spaces (Q2144430)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 07:26, 29 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On quasi norm attaining operators between Banach spaces
scientific article

    Statements

    On quasi norm attaining operators between Banach spaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 June 2022
    0 references
    Motivated by a paper of \textit{G. Godefroy} [Pure Appl. Funct. Anal. 1, No.~1, 39--46 (2016; Zbl 1362.46026)], the authors study the so-called quasi norm-attainment (see Definition~1.1 and Definition~1.2). They say that a bounded linear operator \(T: X \rightarrow Y\) quasi attains its norm whenever \(\overline{T(B_X)} \cap \|T\| S_Y \not= \emptyset\). The set of all operators from \(X\) into \(Y\) which quasi attain their norms is denoted by \(\mbox{QNA}(X, Y)\) while \(\mbox{NA}(X, Y)\) stands for the set of all norm attaining operators (in the classical sense). The paper starts with several remarks concerning quasi norm attaining operators. For instance, the observations that every norm attaining as well as every compact operator from \(X\) into \(Y\) belongs to \(\mbox{QNA}(X, Y)\) bring up the first natural questions such as, for instance, when do the sets \(\mbox{NA}(X, Y)\) and \(\mbox{QNA}(X, Y)\) coincide (see Sections~2 and~4) and when is the set \(\mbox{QNA}(X, Y)\) dense in the whole space \(\mathcal{L}(X, Y)\) (see Section~3). The main theorem of the paper yields several relevant consequences when it comes to the Radon-Nikodým property (see Theorem~3.1). The natural question of what happens when \(X\) or \(Y\) are reflexive spaces is covered by Corollary~3.5, which proves the fact that if \(X\) or \(Y\) has the Radon-Nikodým property, then \(\mbox{QNA}(X, Y)\) is a dense subset. The result stated in Corollary~3.8, which provides a characterization of the Radon-Nikodým property in terms of the denseness of the set \(\mbox{QNA}(X, Y)\), shows that the classical and quasi norm attainment differ even when one deals with natural properties like the Radon-Nikodým property. This also shows that studying the set \(\mbox{QNA}(X, Y)\) is a non-trivial task (see also Example~1.3), relevant for the norm attaining theory and therefore might yield contributions for this field in the near future. The authors also improve some results due to \textit{J. Bourgain} [Isr. J. Math. 28, 265--271 (1977; Zbl 0365.46021)] and \textit{R. Huff} [Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl. 25, 239--241 (1980; Zbl 0434.46004)].
    0 references
    Banach space
    0 references
    Radon-Nikodým property
    0 references
    norm-attaining operator
    0 references
    strong Radon-Nikodým operator
    0 references
    compact operator
    0 references
    remotality
    0 references
    reflexivity
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references