Equivalence in argumentation frameworks with a claim-centric view: classical results with novel ingredients

Cites Work

Unnamed Item
Unnamed Item
Unnamed Item
Unnamed Item
Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning.
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
An abstract, logical approach to characterizing strong equivalence in non-monotonic knowledge representation formalisms
Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases
Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming
A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation
Splitting an Argumentation Framework
Argument Revision
Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
Equivalence in logic-based argumentation
On the different types of collective attacks in abstract argumentation: equivalence results for SETAFs
Enhancing Statement Evaluation in Argumentation via Multi-labelling Systems
Complexity Results and Algorithms for Extension Enforcement in Abstract Argumentation
A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Strongly equivalent logic programs
A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: Equivalence in argumentation frameworks with a claim-centric view: classical results with novel ingredients