Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation using confirmation theory
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- Belief in attacks in epistemic probabilistic argumentation
- Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation, model and application to cyber security
- Circumscription - a form of non-monotonic reasoning
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
- Generating instantiated argument graphs from probabilistic information
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2243383 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3060434 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- Probabilistic reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks
Cited in
(6)- Intrinsic argument strength in structured argumentation: a principled approach
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7582524 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7238895 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5586122 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6263433 (Why is no real title available?)
- Fuzzy labeling semantics for quantitative argumentation
This page was built for publication: Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation using confirmation theory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2146004)
