Fuzzy labeling semantics for quantitative argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: The topic of evaluating argument strength in various quantitative argumentation systems has received increasing attention in the field of abstract argumentation. However, the existing gradual semantics on argument strength considers acceptability degree alone, which may be not sufficient to evaluate arguments in practical scenarios. To adopt a richer characterization for argument strength in real-world applications, we provide a novel quantitative method called fuzzy labeling for fuzzy argumentation systems. For fuzzy labeling, the argument strength is represented as a triple consisting of acceptability, rejectability, and undecidability degree. With a richer scale, it sheds new light on argument strength and gives us a deeper understanding into status of arguments. For the purpose of evaluating arguments, we provide a new way to establish gradual semantics by fuzzy labeling, which is crucial in the evaluation process. We first investigate the rationality postulates of fuzzy labeling, which are important for explaining the rationality of new semantics taking into account the acceptability, rejectability and undecidability degree together. We then propose a set of fuzzy labeling semantics and prove some important properties which are crucial for comparing, understanding and applying semantics.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3560492 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2243383 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Labelling Semantics and Strong Admissibility for Weighted Argumentation Frameworks
- A Principle-based Account of Self-attacking Arguments in Gradual Semantics
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- An Algorithm for Computing Semi-stable Semantics
- An argumentation-based approach for automatic evaluation of design debates
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Equilibrium states in numerical argumentation networks
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
- Fuzzy argumentation system for decision support
- Fuzzy sets
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- Probabilistic argumentation
- Safety case confidence propagation based on Dempster-Shafer theory
- The Dempster-Shafer calculus for statisticians
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- Weighted argumentation
This page was built for publication: Fuzzy labeling semantics for quantitative argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6179533)
