Egalitarian-in-deviation rules relative to a reference system for resolving conflicting claims problems

DOI10.1007/S00355-025-01613-XMaRDI QIDQ7290025zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Josep M. Izquierdo, Carlos Rafels

Publication date 6 July 2026

Published in Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/S00355-025-01613-X

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cooperative games (91A12) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)

Cites work

• A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
• A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
• Bankruptcy problems with reference-dependent preferences
• Bankruptcy problems with two references: an impartial compromise
• Characterization of the Reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by exemption and exclusion properties
• Compromise solutions for bankruptcy situations with references
• Endogenous reference points and the adjusted proportional solution for bargaining problems with claims
• Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
• Game theory techniques for University management: An extended bankruptcy model
• How to divide when there isn't enough. From Aristotle, the Talmud, and Maimonides to the axiomatics of resource allocation
• Rationing in the presence of baselines
• Rationing problems with ex-ante conditions
• Rationing with baselines: the composition extension operator
• The reverse TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
• The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
• Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy
• Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

This page was built for publication: Egalitarian-in-deviation rules relative to a reference system for resolving conflicting claims problems

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q7290025)