Estimating uncertainties using judgmental forecasts with expert heterogeneity
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Using experts' noisy quantile judgments to quantify risks: theory and application to agribusiness
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4155649
- Extracting the collective wisdom in probabilistic judgments
- Combining forecasts with expert information
- Calibration, sharpness and the weighting of experts in a linear opinion pool
Cites work
- A quantile-based approach to system selection
- Better Estimation of PERT Activity Time Parameters
- Combining Probability Distributions from Dependent Information Sources
- Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 794688 (Why is no real title available?)
- LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION OF LOCATION AND SCALE PARAMETERS USING ORDER STATISTICS
- Optimal prediction pools
- Product Portfolio Management with Production Flexibility in Agribusiness
- The composition of optimally wise crowds
- The robustness of mean and variance approximations in risk analysis
- Three-Point Approximations for Continuous Random Variables
- Using experts' noisy quantile judgments to quantify risks: theory and application to agribusiness
Cited in
(4)- Development of the prediction graph method under incomplete and inaccurate expert estimates
- The group calibration index: a group-based approach for assessing forecasters' expertise when external outcome data are missing
- Using experts' noisy quantile judgments to quantify risks: theory and application to agribusiness
- Fifty years of decision analysis in operational research: a review
This page was built for publication: Estimating uncertainties using judgmental forecasts with expert heterogeneity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5131463)