Extremizing and Antiextremizing in Bayesian Ensembles of Binary-Event Forecasts
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- Bagging predictors
- Coherent combination of experts' opinions. (With discussion)
- Combining interval forecasts
- Combining Probability Distributions from Dependent Information Sources
- Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography. With comments, and a rejoinder by the authors
- Combining Probability Forecasts
- Comments on: Assessing probabilistic forecasts of multivariate quantities, with an application to ensemble predictions of surface winds
- Decision Analysis Expert Use
- EP-GIG priors and applications in Bayesian sparse learning
- Evaluating Probabilities: Asymmetric Scoring Rules
- Forecast aggregation via recalibration
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3426675 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 845714 (Why is no real title available?)
- Is combining classifiers with stacking better than selecting the best one?
- On the Reconciliation of Probability Assessments
- Optimal Linear Opinion Pools
- Quantile evaluation, sensitivity to bracketing, and sharing business payoffs
- Random forests
- Reaching a Consensus
- Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
- The Improvement of Probability Judgements
- The Opinion Pool
- Two reasons to make aggregated probability forecasts more extreme
- Updating of Belief in the Light of Someone Else's Opinion
- Using stacking to average Bayesian predictive distributions (with discussion)
This page was built for publication: Extremizing and Antiextremizing in Bayesian Ensembles of Binary-Event Forecasts
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5058057)