How much can you claim?
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- Asymmetric parametric division rules
- Asymmetric rules for claims problems without homogeneity
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule
- Collective rationality and monotone path division rules
- Consistency and its converse: an introduction
- Distributive justice in taxation
- Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
- Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods
- Equal sacrifice taxation
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- How to divide when there isn't enough. From Aristotle, the Talmud, and Maimonides to the axiomatics of resource allocation
- New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Priority and proportionality in bankruptcy
- Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- Taxation and poverty
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
This page was built for publication: How much can you claim?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6988057)