Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
From MaRDI portal
Publication:960252
DOI10.1016/J.JET.2007.12.005zbMATH Open1151.91589OpenAlexW2045223206WikidataQ59972750 ScholiaQ59972750MaRDI QIDQ960252FDOQ960252
William Thomson, Chun-Hsien Yeh
Publication date: 16 December 2008
Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2007.12.005
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- Distributive justice in taxation
- Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems
- The Fair Division of a Fixed Supply Among a Growing Population
- Problems of fair division and the egalitarian solution
- Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
- Sustainability in bankruptcy problems.
- Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Cited In (30)
- Mixed rules in multi‐issue allocation situations
- Duality and anti-duality in TU games applied to solutions, axioms, and axiomatizations
- Bankruptcy problems with reference-dependent preferences
- Relations among the central rules in bankruptcy problems: a strategic perspective
- A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- Allocating \(\mathrm{CO}_2\) emissions: a dynamic claims problem
- Progressive and merging-proof taxation
- On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
- Loss sharing: characterizing a new class of rules
- Mixing solutions for claims problems
- Aggregator operators for dynamic rationing
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Rationing in the presence of baselines
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Resource allocations with guaranteed awards in claims problems
- Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem
- Partial-implementation invariance and claims problems
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
- Random conjugates of bankruptcy rules
- Compromising in bifocal distribution games: the average value
- Lower bounds and recursive methods for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- Equal sacrifice taxation
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- Systematic favorability in claims problems with indivisibilities
- Rationing with baselines: the composition extension operator
- Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems
- A NOTE ON PASSEPARTOUT PROBLEMS
- Equal Area Rule to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims
- NTU-bankruptcy problems: consistency and the relative adjustment principle
- Broadcasting revenue sharing after cancelling sports competitions
Recommendations
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims 👍 👎
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims 👍 👎
- A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims 👍 👎
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims 👍 👎
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims 👍 👎
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims 👍 👎
- On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study 👍 👎
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims 👍 👎
- On the adjudication of conflicting claims: An experimental study 👍 👎
- Equal Area Rule to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims 👍 👎
This page was built for publication: Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q960252)
