Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1961971

DOI10.1007/s001820050122zbMath0940.91022OpenAlexW1984250777WikidataQ114692925 ScholiaQ114692925MaRDI QIDQ1961971

Youngsub Chun

Publication date: 30 January 2000

Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820050122




Related Items (40)

Introduction to the special issue in honor of William ThomsonTaxation and povertyA new uncertain insurance model with variational lower limitThe reverse TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problemsWary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arriveThe reverse Talmud family of rules for bankruptcy problems: a characterizationFor claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rulesPriority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problemStrategic justifications of the TAL family of rules for bankruptcy problemsRemarks on solidarity in bankruptcy problems when agents merge or splitAxiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.The separability principle in single-peaked economies with participation constraintsThe equal share proportional solution in a permit sharing problemA common ground for resource and welfare egalitarianismAdditive adjudication of conflicting claimsThe separability principle in economies with single-peaked preferencesA note on the separability principle in economies with single-peaked preferencesSustainability, exemption, and the constrained equal awards rule: a note.Rationing with baselines: the composition extension operatorBalanced allocation methods for claims problems with indivisibilitiesRationing in the presence of baselinesSecured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problemsAllocation rules on networksOn the convergence of the random arrival rule in large claims problemsOn the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approachPriority and proportionality in bankruptcyOn properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistencyNon-bossinessOperators for the adjudication of conflicting claimsFlow sharing and bankruptcy gamesA strategic justification of the Talmud rule based on lower and upper boundsPriority, solidarity and egalitarianismUp methods in the allocation of indivisibilities when preferences are single-peakedConsistency and its converse: an introductionTwo families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claimsAn uncertain alternating renewal insurance risk modelConstrained stochastic cost allocationSystematic favorability in claims problems with indivisibilitiesThe three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.Characterization of the Reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by exemption and exclusion properties




This page was built for publication: Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems