Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems
From MaRDI portal
DOI10.1007/S001820050122zbMATH Open0940.91022OpenAlexW1984250777WikidataQ114692925 ScholiaQ114692925MaRDI QIDQ1961971FDOQ1961971
Authors: Youngsub Chun 
Publication date: 30 January 2000
Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820050122
Recommendations
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Additive rules in bankruptcy problems and other related problems.
- Characterizing NTU-bankruptcy rules using bargaining axioms
- Priority and proportionality in bankruptcy
- Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems
Cited In (51)
- Partial-implementation invariance and claims problems
- Solidarity to achieve stability
- Priority and proportionality in bankruptcy
- On the convergence of the random arrival rule in large claims problems
- Sustainability, exemption, and the constrained equal awards rule: a note.
- The equal share proportional solution in a permit sharing problem
- A new uncertain insurance model with variational lower limit
- Allocation rules on networks
- Integer solutions to bankruptcy problems with non-integer claims
- Constrained stochastic cost allocation
- A strategic justification of the Talmud rule based on lower and upper bounds
- A common ground for resource and welfare egalitarianism
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
- Flow sharing and bankruptcy games
- Remarks on the integer Talmud solution for integer bankruptcy problems
- The Bilateral Consistent Prekernel, the Core, and NTU Bankruptcy Problems
- Balanced allocation methods for claims problems with indivisibilities
- Up methods in the allocation of indivisibilities when preferences are single-peaked
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- The reverse TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems
- Rationing in the presence of baselines
- Introduction to the special issue in honor of William Thomson
- Non-bossiness
- Leximin rules for bankruptcy problems under uncertainty
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- The minimal overlap rule: restrictions on mergers for creditors' consensus
- For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem
- A note on the separability principle in economies with single-peaked preferences
- Strategic justifications of the TAL family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
- A bankruptcy approach to the core cover
- The separability principle in single-peaked economies with participation constraints
- Remarks on solidarity in bankruptcy problems when agents merge or split
- The constrained equal awards rule for bankruptcy problems with a priori unions
- Systematic favorability in claims problems with indivisibilities
- Rationing with baselines: the composition extension operator
- Integer solutions to bankruptcy problems: the IPROP solution
- Priority, solidarity and egalitarianism
- Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems
- The reverse Talmud family of rules for bankruptcy problems: a characterization
- An uncertain alternating renewal insurance risk model
- Taxation and poverty
- Consistency and its converse: an introduction
- Characterization of the Reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by exemption and exclusion properties
- The separability principle in economies with single-peaked preferences
- Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive
This page was built for publication: Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1961971)
