On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency

DOI10.1016/J.JMATECO.2008.01.001MaRDI QIDQ952680zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Toru Hokari, William Thomson

Publication date 13 November 2008

Published in Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2008.01.001

zbMATH Keywords

claims problemsconsistencyconstrained equal awards ruleconstrained equal losses rulelifting

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Public goods (91B18)

Recommendations

• A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
• Collective rationality and monotone path division rules
• On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
• Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims

Cites work

• A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
• A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
• A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
• Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems
• Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule
• Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems
• Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
• Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
• On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
• Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
• Sustainability in bankruptcy problems.
• The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach
• The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.

Cited in

(20)

• Up methods in the allocation of indivisibilities when preferences are single-peaked
• Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
• A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Consistent strategy-proof assignment by hierarchical exchange
• Rationing with baselines: the composition extension operator
• Rationing in the presence of baselines
• On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
• Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
• The nucleolus of the bankruptcy problem by hydraulic rationing
• A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
• Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Allocation rules on networks
• Progressive and merging-proof taxation
• Random conjugates of bankruptcy rules
• Consistency and its converse: an introduction
• Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
• For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
• For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules

This page was built for publication: On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q952680)