On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
From MaRDI portal
Publication:952680
DOI10.1016/J.JMATECO.2008.01.001zbMATH Open1152.91022OpenAlexW2000766064WikidataQ59972770 ScholiaQ59972770MaRDI QIDQ952680FDOQ952680
Publication date: 13 November 2008
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2008.01.001
Recommendations
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
- Collective rationality and monotone path division rules
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Cites Work
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems
- Sustainability in bankruptcy problems.
- Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule
- The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Cited In (20)
- A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- Allocation rules on networks
- Progressive and merging-proof taxation
- Up methods in the allocation of indivisibilities when preferences are single-peaked
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- THE NUCLEOLUS OF THE BANKRUPTCY PROBLEM BY HYDRAULIC RATIONING
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Rationing in the presence of baselines
- For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- Consistent strategy-proof assignment by hierarchical exchange
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
- Random conjugates of bankruptcy rules
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- Rationing with baselines: the composition extension operator
- The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof
- Consistency and its converse: an introduction
This page was built for publication: On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q952680)
