Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:447526)
In the context of adjudication of conflicting claims, the main contributions of the present paper are: -- to identify a general and simple criterion for Lorenz comparisons; -- exploiting the consistency rule towards Lorenz domination; -- using a specific operator on the space of rules to preserve the Lorenz order.
Recommendations
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
Cites work
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra's proposal
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- Inequality preserving rationing
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
- On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems
- The minimal overlap rule revisited
- The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Cited in
(21)- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Correction to: ``Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Inequality minimising subsidy and taxation
- Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
- Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive
- Egalitarianism in the queueing problem
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- No-envy in the queueing problem with multiple identical machines
- Refining the Lorenz‐ranking of rules for claims problems on restricted domains
- Deviation from proportionality and Lorenz-domination for claims problems
- Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses
- Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Population Lorenz-monotonic allocation schemes for TU-games
- Rationalizing sharing rules
- For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
This page was built for publication: Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q447526)
