Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
From MaRDI portal
Publication:447526
DOI10.1007/s00199-010-0575-5zbMath1247.91033OpenAlexW2004558149WikidataQ59972740 ScholiaQ59972740MaRDI QIDQ447526
Publication date: 4 September 2012
Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10535/4005
Related Items
Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims ⋮ Inequality minimising subsidy and taxation ⋮ Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive ⋮ For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules ⋮ Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses ⋮ Refining the Lorenz‐ranking of rules for claims problems on restricted domains ⋮ Egalitarianism in the queueing problem ⋮ Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses ⋮ Deviation from proportionality and Lorenz-domination for claims problems ⋮ For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules ⋮ Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits ⋮ Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update ⋮ No-envy in the Queueing Problem with Multiple Identical Machines
Cites Work
- Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction
- The minimal overlap rule revisited
- On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
- Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra's proposal
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Inequality preserving rationing
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
