Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims)
In the context of adjudication of conflicting claims, the main contributions of the present paper are: -- to identify a general and simple criterion for Lorenz comparisons; -- exploiting the consistency rule towards Lorenz domination; -- using a specific operator on the space of rules to preserve the Lorenz order.
Recommendations
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
Cites work
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra's proposal
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- Inequality preserving rationing
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
- On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems
- The minimal overlap rule revisited
- The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Cited in
(21)- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Correction to: ``Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Inequality minimising subsidy and taxation
- Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
- Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive
- Egalitarianism in the queueing problem
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- No-envy in the queueing problem with multiple identical machines
- Refining the Lorenz‐ranking of rules for claims problems on restricted domains
- Deviation from proportionality and Lorenz-domination for claims problems
- Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses
- Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Population Lorenz-monotonic allocation schemes for TU-games
- Rationalizing sharing rules
- For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
This page was built for publication: Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q447526)
