Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses
From MaRDI portal
Publication:617612
DOI10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.08.009zbMath1232.91365MaRDI QIDQ617612
Yoichi Kasajima, Rodrigo A. Velez
Publication date: 21 January 2011
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.08.009
proportional rule; Lorenz domination; claims problems; inequality preservation; minimal award functions
91B32: Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.)
Related Items
Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims, Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses, Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
Cites Work
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Progressive and merging-proof taxation
- Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses
- Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
- On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- Distributive justice in taxation
- The proportional solution for rights problems
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Inequality preserving rationing
- Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 1.
- Egalitarianism and Utilitarianism in Quasi-Linear Bargaining
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods