Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

DOI10.1007/S00182-010-0269-ZMaRDI QIDQ647352zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Kristof Bosmans, Luc Lauwers

Publication date 23 November 2011

Published in International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-010-0269-z

zbMATH Keywords

taxationbankruptcyLorenz dominanceproportional ruleconstrained equal awards ruleminimal overlap ruleconstrained equal losses ruleclaims problemadjusted proportional ruleconstrained egalitarian rulePiniles' rulerandom arrival ruleTalmud rule

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Individual preferences (91B08)

Recommendations

• Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules

Cites work

• A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
• Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
• Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 1.
• Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
• The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
• Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy
• Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

Cited in

(17)

• The art of sharing resources: how to distribute water during a drought period
• Bankruptcy problems with reference-dependent preferences
• Refining the Lorenz‐ranking of rules for claims problems on restricted domains
• Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Correction to: ``Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses
• Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses
• Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Population Lorenz-monotonic allocation schemes for TU-games
• Inequality minimising subsidy and taxation
• For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
• A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
• Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
• A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum
• Deviation from proportionality and Lorenz-domination for claims problems
• Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits

This page was built for publication: Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q647352)