Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
From MaRDI portal
Publication:647352
DOI10.1007/s00182-010-0269-zzbMath1233.91085OpenAlexW3124606576MaRDI QIDQ647352
Publication date: 23 November 2011
Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-010-0269-z
bankruptcytaxationproportional ruleLorenz dominanceconstrained equal awards ruleminimal overlap ruleconstrained equal losses ruleclaims problemadjusted proportional ruleconstrained egalitarian rulePiniles' rulerandom arrival ruleTalmud rule
Related Items (11)
Inequality minimising subsidy and taxation ⋮ Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses ⋮ Refining the Lorenz‐ranking of rules for claims problems on restricted domains ⋮ Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses ⋮ Bankruptcy problems with reference-dependent preferences ⋮ Deviation from proportionality and Lorenz-domination for claims problems ⋮ For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules ⋮ Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits ⋮ A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
Cites Work
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 1.
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
This page was built for publication: Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
