Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
DOI10.1007/S00182-010-0269-ZzbMATH Open1233.91085OpenAlexW3124606576MaRDI QIDQ647352FDOQ647352
Publication date: 23 November 2011
Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-010-0269-z
Recommendations
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
taxationbankruptcyLorenz dominanceproportional ruleconstrained equal awards ruleminimal overlap ruleconstrained equal losses ruleclaims problemadjusted proportional ruleconstrained egalitarian rulePiniles' rulerandom arrival ruleTalmud rule
Cites Work
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 1.
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Cited In (17)
- The art of sharing resources: how to distribute water during a drought period
- Bankruptcy problems with reference-dependent preferences
- Refining the Lorenz‐ranking of rules for claims problems on restricted domains
- Correction to: ``Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses
- Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses
- Population Lorenz-monotonic allocation schemes for TU-games
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Inequality minimising subsidy and taxation
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
- A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum
- Deviation from proportionality and Lorenz-domination for claims problems
- Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits
This page was built for publication: Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q647352)
