Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1038711
DOI10.1007/s00355-008-0302-3zbMath1176.91042OpenAlexW2079747628WikidataQ59972753 ScholiaQ59972753MaRDI QIDQ1038711
Publication date: 20 November 2009
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10535/4194
Public goods (91B18) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Related Items (24)
Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims ⋮ Inequality minimising subsidy and taxation ⋮ The reverse TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems ⋮ Reassignment-proof rules for land rental problems ⋮ Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive ⋮ The reverse Talmud family of rules for bankruptcy problems: a characterization ⋮ Duality in land rental problems ⋮ For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules ⋮ Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem ⋮ Strategic justifications of the TAL family of rules for bankruptcy problems ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. ⋮ Bankruptcy and the per capita nucleolus: the claim-and-right rules family ⋮ Allocating \(\mathrm{CO}_2\) emissions: a dynamic claims problem ⋮ For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules ⋮ A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ The reverse self-dual serial cost-sharing rule ⋮ Equal-quantile rules in resource allocation with uncertain needs ⋮ On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach ⋮ Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits ⋮ Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update ⋮ Characterization of the Reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by exemption and exclusion properties
Cites Work
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
- Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra's proposal
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules
- The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof
- Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
This page was built for publication: Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims