On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2463792
DOI10.1007/s10058-007-0027-2zbMath1136.91501OpenAlexW2041654815WikidataQ59972775 ScholiaQ59972775MaRDI QIDQ2463792
Publication date: 6 December 2007
Published in: Review of Economic Design (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-007-0027-2
proportional ruleconstrained equal awards ruleclaims problemsconstrained equal losses ruleconsistent extensions
Applications of game theory (91A80) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Related Items (17)
Taxation and poverty ⋮ Self-enforcing coalitions with power accumulation ⋮ Implementing efficient graphs in connection networks ⋮ The reverse Talmud family of rules for bankruptcy problems: a characterization ⋮ For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules ⋮ Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem ⋮ Random conjugates of bankruptcy rules ⋮ Equal Area Rule to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims ⋮ For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules ⋮ A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems ⋮ On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency ⋮ On societies choosing social outcomes, and their memberships: internal stability and consistency ⋮ Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ GAME-THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF BANKRUPTCY AND TAXATION PROBLEMS: RECENT ADVANCES ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update ⋮ Characterization of the Reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by exemption and exclusion properties
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Parametric rationing methods
- On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- An axiomatization of the core of cooperative games without side payments
- A study of choice correspondences in economies with a variable number of agents
- Stability and the Nash solution
- Monotonicity and independence axioms
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- Consistency and characterization of the core of two-sided matching problems
- Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems
- Consistent extensions
- Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule
- `Hydraulic' rationing
- The consistent Shapley value for hyperplane games
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules
- Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- No-Envy and Consistency in Economies with Indivisible Goods
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- The kernel of a cooperative game
This page was built for publication: On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach