Equal area rule to adjudicate conflicting claims

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-93809-7_14MaRDI QIDQ5111110zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors William Thomson

Publication date 26 May 2020

Published in Studies in Economic Design (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93809-7_14

zbMATH Keywords

adjudication of conflicting claimsequal area solutiontwo-player bargaining problems

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

2-person games (91A05) Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)

Recommendations

• A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
• From bargaining solutions to claims rules: a proportional approach
• Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
• For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
• Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

Cites work

• A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
• A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
• A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
• Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems
• Distributive justice in taxation
• Duality, area-considerations, and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution
• Dynamics and axiomatics of the equal area bargaining solution
• Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods
• Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
• How to divide when there isn't enough. From Aristotle, the Talmud, and Maimonides to the axiomatics of resource allocation
• Let them cheat!
• Noncooperative Foundations of the Area Monotonic Solution
• On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
• Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• The area monotonic solution to the cooperative bargaining problem
• The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach
• The bargaining problem
• The pseudo-average rule: bankruptcy, cost allocation and bargaining
• The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
• The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof

Cited in

(5)

• Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• From bargaining solutions to claims rules: a proportional approach
• Fair allocation of disputed properties
• Two principles for two-person social choice
• Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims

This page was built for publication: Equal area rule to adjudicate conflicting claims

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5111110)