For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
From MaRDI portal
Publication:889256
DOI10.1007/S00199-015-0888-5zbMATH Open1367.91093OpenAlexW618756020WikidataQ59972677 ScholiaQ59972677MaRDI QIDQ889256FDOQ889256
Publication date: 6 November 2015
Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-015-0888-5
Recommendations
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
Cooperative games (91A12) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Cites Work
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
- Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods
- The proportional solution for rights problems
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems
- A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum
- A short course on functional equations. Based upon recent applications to the social and behavioral sciences
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
- Sustainability in bankruptcy problems.
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach
- Collective rationality and monotone path division rules
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
- Taxation and poverty
- Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem
Cited In (17)
- Compromising between the proportional and equal division values
- The proportional rule for problems with constraints and claims.
- The constrained equal loss rule in problems with constraints and claims
- Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues
- Asymmetric rules for claims problems without homogeneity
- The reverse TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- Introduction to the special issue in honor of William Thomson
- Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- A compromise solution for claims problems
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- Reassignment-proof rules for land rental problems
- The average-of-awards rule for claims problems
- Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
- Taxation and poverty
- Deviation from proportionality and Lorenz-domination for claims problems
- Protective properties and the constrained equal awards rule for claims problems: A note
This page was built for publication: For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q889256)
