On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2268386
Recommendations
- Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
Cites work
- A noncooperative justification for egalitarian surplus sharing
- A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- An Experimental Comparison of Dispute Rates in Alternative Arbitration Systems
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1099354 (Why is no real title available?)
- Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
- On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction
- Parametric rationing methods
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Two-Person Cooperative Games
Cited in
(13)- Fixed price plus rationing: an experiment
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Correction to: ``Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate
- A bargaining procedure leading to the serial rule in games with veto players
- Fair allocation rules for the commons -- informing water policy design through survey methods
- Are individuals more generous in loss contexts?
- On the adjudication of conflicting claims: An experimental study
- Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
This page was built for publication: On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2268386)
