On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2268386
DOI10.1007/s00355-009-0398-0zbMath1183.91029MaRDI QIDQ2268386
Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, Carmen Herrero, Giovanni Ponti
Publication date: 8 March 2010
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://repec.org/esNASM04/up.9578.1074890352.pdf
Nash equilibrium; experimental study; constrained equal awards; conflicting claims; proportional/constrained equal losses rule
Related Items
A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate, A bargaining procedure leading to the serial rule in games with veto players, Are individuals more generous in loss contexts?, Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims, Fixed price plus rationing: an experiment
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Parametric rationing methods
- Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims
- Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
- On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- A noncooperative justification for egalitarian surplus sharing
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- An Experimental Comparison of Dispute Rates in Alternative Arbitration Systems
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- Two-Person Cooperative Games
