On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study

DOI10.1007/s00355-009-0398-0zbMath1183.91029OpenAlexW3122099663MaRDI QIDQ2268386

Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, Carmen Herrero, Giovanni Ponti

Publication date: 8 March 2010

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://repec.org/esNASM04/up.9578.1074890352.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

Nash equilibriumexperimental studyconstrained equal awardsconflicting claimsproportional/constrained equal losses rule

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14) Experimental studies (91A90)

Related Items (5)

Are individuals more generous in loss contexts? ⋮ Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims ⋮ A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate ⋮ A bargaining procedure leading to the serial rule in games with veto players ⋮ Fixed price plus rationing: an experiment

Uses Software

• Z-Tree

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Parametric rationing methods
• Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims
• Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
• On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction
• Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
• A noncooperative justification for egalitarian surplus sharing
• A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
• A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
• The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
• An Experimental Comparison of Dispute Rates in Alternative Arbitration Systems
• A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
• Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
• Two-Person Cooperative Games

This page was built for publication: On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study