Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2358792
Recommendations
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- The equal award principle in problems with constraints and claims
- For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Protective properties and the constrained equal awards rule for claims problems: A note
- A new characterization of the proportional rule for claims problems
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
Cites work
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- A revealed preference analysis of solutions to simple allocation problems
- A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- Additive rules in bankruptcy problems and other related problems.
- Additive rules in discrete allocation problems
- Asymmetric parametric division rules
- Asymmetric rules for claims problems without homogeneity
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule
- Collective rationality and monotone path division rules
- Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
- Cost sharing in networks: some open questions
- Distributive justice in taxation
- Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods
- Fair allocation of disputed properties
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3078997 (Why is no real title available?)
- Impartiality, Priority, and Solidarity in the Theory of Justice
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules
- Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- On recursive solutions to simple allocation problems
- Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- Rationing in the presence of baselines
- Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems
- Taxation and poverty
- The minimal overlap rule revisited
- The proportional random allocation of indivisible units
- The proportional solution for rights problems
- The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
Cited in
(12)- The reverse Talmud family of rules for bankruptcy problems: a characterization
- Priority and proportionality in bankruptcy
- Equal sacrifice taxation
- On how to allocate the fixed cost of transport systems
- The reverse TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- Additive adjudication of conflicting claims
- Rationalizing sharing rules
- Equal treatment of unsatisfied agents
- How much can you claim?
- Weighted proportionality with exclusions in bilateral claims problems
- Claims manipulations discriminate between egalitarian rules
- For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
This page was built for publication: Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2358792)