Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra's proposal
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1780909
DOI10.1007/S00199-004-0527-ZzbMATH Open1109.91306OpenAlexW1975697826MaRDI QIDQ1780909FDOQ1780909
José Alcalde, José Angel Silva, María del Carmen Marco-Gil
Publication date: 14 June 2005
Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://www.ivie.es/downloads/docs/wpasad/wpasad-2002-28.pdf
Recommendations
Cooperative games (91A12) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Cited In (12)
- Three ancient problems solved by using the game theory logic based on the Shapley value
- A new approach for bounding awards in bankruptcy problems
- Refining the Lorenz‐ranking of rules for claims problems on restricted domains
- Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Resource allocations with guaranteed awards in claims problems
- Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses
- The minimal overlap rule revisited
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Inequality minimising subsidy and taxation
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- Game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: recent advances
- Proportional rules for state contingent claims
This page was built for publication: Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra's proposal
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1780909)