Characterizing NTU-bankruptcy rules using bargaining axioms
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2095941
DOI10.1007/s10479-020-03828-wzbMath1505.91195OpenAlexW3093314168MaRDI QIDQ2095941
Publication date: 15 November 2022
Published in: Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03828-w
Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Related Items (2)
On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results ⋮ Generalizing the constrained equal awards rule
Cites Work
- The bargaining problem with an uncertain conflict outcome
- Monotonicity and independence axioms
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- Nash solution and uncertain disagreement points
- Bargaining problems with claims
- Independence of irrelevant alternatives, and solutions to Nash's bargaining problem
- Endogenous reference points and the adjusted proportional solution for bargaining problems with claims
- Duality, area-considerations, and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution
- Bankruptcy games with nontransferable utility
- NTU-bankruptcy problems: consistency and the relative adjustment principle
- Bargaining with independence of higher or irrelevant claims
- Proportionality, equality, and duality in bankruptcy problems with nontransferable utility
- Nontransferable utility bankruptcy games
- Characterizations of Bargaining Solutions by Properties of Their Status Quo Sets
- The Bargaining Problem
- Characterizing the Nash and Raiffa Bargaining Solutions by Disagreement Point Axioms
- Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem
- Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons
- The Bilateral Consistent Prekernel, the Core, and NTU Bankruptcy Problems
This page was built for publication: Characterizing NTU-bankruptcy rules using bargaining axioms