A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims

DOI10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.01.004zbMath1236.91092MaRDI QIDQ414378

Lars Peter Østerdal, Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, Jens Leth Hougaard

Publication date: 11 May 2012

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://okonomi.foi.dk/workingpapers/MSAPpdf/MSAP2011/MSAP_WP01_2011.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

operators; composition; rationing; baselines; claims

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

91B32: Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.)

Related Items

Entropy, desegregation, and proportional rationing, Stable partitions for games with non-transferable utility and externalities, Enjoying cooperative games: the \textbf{R} package \textbf{GameTheory}, Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update, Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims, The reverse TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems, Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive, Rationing with baselines: the composition extension operator, Rationing in the presence of baselines, Rationing problems with ex-ante conditions

Cites Work

• The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
• Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
• On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
• Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
• Distributive justice in taxation
• A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
• The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
• A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
• The Conditional Auction Mechanism for Sharing a Surplus
• Impartiality, Priority, and Solidarity in the Theory of Justice
• On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
• Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods