A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
From MaRDI portal
Publication:414378
DOI10.1016/J.JMATECO.2012.01.004zbMATH Open1236.91092OpenAlexW2112346392MaRDI QIDQ414378FDOQ414378
Authors: Jens Leth Hougaard, Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, Lars Peter Østerdal 
Publication date: 11 May 2012
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://okonomi.foi.dk/workingpapers/MSAPpdf/MSAP2011/MSAP_WP01_2011.pdf
Recommendations
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- Lower bounds and recursive methods for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
Cites Work
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Distributive justice in taxation
- Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
- Impartiality, Priority, and Solidarity in the Theory of Justice
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- The Conditional Auction Mechanism for Sharing a Surplus
- The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
Cited In (28)
- On the adjudication of conflicting claims: An experimental study
- Bankruptcy problems with reference-dependent preferences
- Enjoying cooperative games: the \textbf{R} package \textbf{GameTheory}
- Allocating \(\mathrm{CO}_2\) emissions: a dynamic claims problem
- A multicriteria approach for analysis of conflicts in evidence theory
- Manipulation via merging and splitting in claims problems
- Constrained welfare egalitarianism in surplus-sharing problems
- Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Loss sharing: characterizing a new class of rules
- Entitlements to continued life and the evaluation of population health
- On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach
- Aggregator operators for dynamic rationing
- Correction to: ``Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- The reverse TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
- Rationing in the presence of baselines
- Rationing problems with ex-ante conditions
- Resource allocations with guaranteed awards in claims problems
- Entropy, desegregation, and proportional rationing
- Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Lower bounds and recursive methods for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
- Rationing with baselines: the composition extension operator
- Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
- Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive
- Broadcasting revenue sharing after cancelling sports competitions
- Stable partitions for games with non-transferable utility and externalities
This page was built for publication: A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q414378)
