Incomplete higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-981-96-7956-0_3MaRDI QIDQ6877248zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Sylvie Doutre, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Jean-Guy Mailly, Antonio Yuste-Ginel

Publication date 8 January 2026

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-7956-0_3

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationhigher-order attacksincompleteness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites work

• A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change
• Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• Dynamic logic of propositional assignments: a well-behaved variant of PDL
• Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
• Extending abstract argumentation systems theory
• Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks
• How to manage supports in incomplete argumentation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6934384 (Why is no real title available?)
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• Possible controllability of control argumentation frameworks
• Qualitative uncertainty and dynamics of argumentation through dynamic logic
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: Incomplete higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6877248)