Simultaneous approximation by Bernstein polynomials with integer coefficients (Q1801174)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6966592
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Simultaneous approximation by Bernstein polynomials with integer coefficients
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6966592

      Statements

      Simultaneous approximation by Bernstein polynomials with integer coefficients (English)
      0 references
      26 October 2018
      0 references
      The author studies two modifications of the Bernstein polynomials for \(f\in C[0,1]\) and proves results for these modifications that have been proved before for the ordinary Bernstein polynomials The first modifications is due to \textit{L. V. Kantorovich} [Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS 1931, No. 9, 1163--1168 (1931; Zbl 0003.39102)] and uses \[ B_n(f)(x)=\sum_{k=0}^n\,\left[f\left({k\over n}\right){n\choose k} \right] x^k(1-x)^{n-k}, \] with \([\alpha]\) the largest integer less than or equal to \(\alpha\in \mathbb{R}\) (the \textit{entier}). The second one is \[ \tilde{B}_n(f)(x)=\sum_{k=0}^n\,\left\langle f\left({k\over n}\right){n\choose k} \right\rangle x^k(1-x)^{n-k}, \] where \(\langle\alpha\rangle\) is the integer for which the minimum \(\min_{m\in{\mathbb Z}}\,|\alpha -m|\) is attained (when \(\alpha\) is in the middle between two consecutive integers, either of these can be taken). The main results are Theorem 1.1. Let \(s\in{\mathbb N}\). Let \(f\in C^s[0,1]\) be such that \(f(0), f(1), f'(0), f'(1)\in{\mathbb Z}\) and \(f^{(i)}(0)=f^{(i)}(1)=0,\;2\leq i\leq s\). Moreover, let there exist an \(n_0\in [\mathbb N,n_0]\geq s\), such that \[ f\left( {k\over n}\right)\geq f(0)+{k\over n}\,f'(0),\quad 1\leq k\leq s,\quad n\geq n_0, \] \[ f\left( {k\over n}\right)\geq f(1)-\left(1-{k\over n}\right)\,f'(1),\quad n-s\leq k\leq n-1,\quad n\geq n_0. \] Then for \(n\geq n_0\) holds \[ \|(\widetilde{B}_n(f))^{(s)}-f^{(s)}\|\leq c \begin{cases}\omega_{\varphi}^2(f', n^{-1/2})+\omega_1(f', n^{-1})+{1\over n}, \quad s=1, \\ \omega_{\varphi}^2(f', n^{-1/2})+\omega_1(f', n^{-1})+{1\over n}\|f^{(s)}\| +{1\over n},\quad s\geq 2.\end{cases} \] The constant \(c\) is independent of \(f\) and \(n\). Theorem 1.3 Let \(s\in{\mathbb N}\). Let \(f\in C^s[0,1]\) be such that \(f(0), f(1), f'(0), f'(1)\in{\mathbb Z}\) and \(f^{(i)}(0)=f^{(i)}(1)=0,\;2\leq i\leq s\). Then \[ \|(\widehat{B}_n(f))^{(s)}-f^{(s)}\|\leq c\begin{cases} \omega_{\varphi}^2(f', n^{-1/2})+\omega_1(f', n^{-1})+{1\over n}, \quad s=1, \\ \omega_{\varphi}^2(f', n^{-1/2})+\omega_1(f', n^{-1})+{1\over n}\|f^{(s)}\| +{1\over n},\quad s\geq 2.\end{cases} \] The constant \(c\) is independent of \(f\) and \(n\). Moreover, the author proves the necessity of the assumptions in Theorems 1.1 and 1.3 in the Theorems 3.1 and 3.2. The paper uses the ordinary modulu of continuity \(\omega_1(\cdot,\cdot)\) in the sup-norm on \([0,1]\) and the Ditzian-Totik modulus of smoothness \(\omega_{\varphi}^2(\cdot,\cdot)\) controlled by the weight function \(\varphi(x)=\sqrt{x(1-x)}\), also in the uniform norm on \([0,1]\).
      0 references
      Bernstein polynomials
      0 references
      integer coefficients
      0 references
      simultaneous approximation
      0 references
      rate of convergence
      0 references
      modulus of continuity
      0 references
      modulus of smoothness
      0 references

      Identifiers