Some stronger forms of topological transitivity and sensitivity for a sequence of uniformly convergent continuous maps (Q2226333)

Given a metric space \(H\) and a sequence of continuous self-maps \((g_n)\) uniformly converging to a continuous self-map \(g\) of \(H\), the paper deals with the problem of understanding which properties of the dynamical systems \((H,g_n)\) pass to the limit system \((H,g)\). Under certain pretty technical assumptions, the authors state sufficient conditions for the system \((H,g)\) to be topologically ergodic (the set of returns \(\{m\in{\mathbb Z}_+\colon T^m(U)\cap V\neq\emptyset\}\) has positive upper density for every non-empty open \(U,V\)), topologically mixing (the set of returns is cofinite), and topologically transitive, as well as a very large number of further variations on those properties and various flavours of sensitivity. The article is neither carefully written nor refereed. For example, the symbols for lower and upper density of a subset of integers are being used without explanation. The following statement, found at page 3, sums it up well: ``Topological double ergodicity implies topological double ergodicity, but topological double ergodicity does not imply topological double ergodicity''.