Yet another version of Mumford's theorem (Q2257987)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6410129
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Yet another version of Mumford's theorem
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6410129

      Statements

      Yet another version of Mumford's theorem (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      2 March 2015
      0 references
      Let \(X\) be a smooth projective variety of dimension \(n\) over \(\mathbb{C}\), and \(h\in H^2(X,\mathbb{Q})\) the class of an ample line bundle. The hard Lefschetz theorem asserts that the map \(L^{n-i}:H^i(X,\mathbb{Q})\rightarrow H^{2n-i}(X,\mathbb{Q})\) obtained by cupping with \(h^{n-i}\) is an isomorphism for any \(i<n\). The standard Lefschetz conjecture, called \(B(X,i)\) for a given \(i<n\), asserts that the inverse isomorphism \((L^{n-i})^{-1}\) is induced by an algebraic correspondence. The main result of the present paper is the following: If there is an \(i\) such that the Chow group \(A^i(X)_{\mathbb{Q}}\) is supported on a divisor and \(B(X,j)\) holds true for any \(j\leq i\), then the cohomology group \(H^i(X,\mathbb{Q})\) is supported on a divisor. As a direct consequence he shows that for any variety \(X\) with \(H^{i,0}(X)\neq 0\), which satisfies the standard Lefschetz conjecture, there is no Chow group \(A^i(X)_{\mathbb{Q}}\) supported on a divisor.
      0 references
      0 references
      algebraic cycles
      0 references
      Chow groups
      0 references

      Identifiers