A proof of the Weierstraß gap theorem not using the Riemann-Roch formula (Q2299127)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7171656
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    A proof of the Weierstraß gap theorem not using the Riemann-Roch formula
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7171656

      Statements

      A proof of the Weierstraß gap theorem not using the Riemann-Roch formula (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      20 February 2020
      0 references
      Let \(X\) be a compact Riemann surface with genus \(g\ge 1\). The Weierstrass gap theorem states that for each \(P\in X\), there are exactly \(g\) integers, \(n_j(P)\), with \[ 1=n_1(P)< n_2(P) < \cdots < n_g(P) \le 2g-1 \] such that there is no meromorphic function on \(X\) which is holomorphic on \(X-\{P\}\) and has a pole of order \(n_j(P)\) at \(P\). The proof of the theorem is an application of the Riemann-Roch Theorem. The authors propose an alternative combinatorial proof that makes use of ideas from modular function algebras, integral bases and Puiseux series.
      0 references
      Weierstraß gap theorem
      0 references
      modular functions
      0 references

      Identifiers