Isogeny class and Frobenius root statistics for abelian varieties over finite fields (Q2732624)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1624642
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Isogeny class and Frobenius root statistics for abelian varieties over finite fields
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1624642

      Statements

      19 September 2001
      0 references
      Abelian variety
      0 references
      isogeny class
      0 references
      Frobenius root
      0 references
      elliptic curve
      0 references
      Sato-Tate conjecture
      0 references
      probability measure
      0 references
      0 references
      Isogeny class and Frobenius root statistics for abelian varieties over finite fields (English)
      0 references
      Let \(A\) be an abelian variety of dimension \(g\) over a number field \(k\). Let \(v\) be a finite place of \(k\) of good reduction for \(A\). Then by standard conjectures, the characteristic polynomial of the Frobenius at \(v\), acting on the \(\ell\)-adic Tate module of \(A\), does not depend on \(\ell\), and its roots have absolute value \(q_v^{1/2}\), where \(q_v\) is the size of the residue class field. The eigenvalues, multiplied by \(q_v^{-1/2}\), then can be specified uniquely as \(\{e^{\pi i \theta_1}, e^{-\pi i \theta_1}, \dots, e^{\pi i \theta_g}, e^{- \pi i \theta_g}\}\) with \(0 \leq \theta_1 \leq \dots \leq \theta_g \leq 1\). Write \(\Theta_{A,v} = \theta(A_{k_v}) = (\theta_1, \dots, \theta_g) \in \Sigma_g\) with \(\Sigma_g = \{\theta \in {\mathbb R}^g :0\leq \theta_1 \leq \dots \leq \theta_g \leq 1\}\). NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe Sato-Tate conjecture for \(A\) then asserts that the family \(\Theta_A = \bigcup_v A_{A,v}\) is uniformly distributed in \(\Sigma_g\) with respect to the probability measure induced by the Haar measure of \({\text{USP}}_{2g}({\mathbb C})\), explicitly NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\mu_{ST}(g)=2^{g^2} \left(\prod_{j<k} (\cos \pi\theta_k - \cos \pi\theta_j)^2\right) \prod_i (\sin^2(\pi\theta_i) d\theta_i).NEWLINE\]NEWLINE Write NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\Theta_q = \{\theta(A) : A/{\mathbb F}_q {\text{ up to isomorphism}}\}NEWLINE\]NEWLINE (as a family, i.e., with multiplicities). In the case of elliptic curves, the assertion is known when one replaces \(\Theta_A\) by the family \(\bigcup_p \Theta_p\) [\textit{B. Birch}, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 43, 57-60 (1968; Zbl 0183.25503)] or by \(\bigcup_m \Theta_{p^m}\) (\textit{H. Yoshida} [Invent. Math. 19, 261-177 (1973; Zbl 0292.14011)], \textit{V. K. Murty} [Progr. Math. 26, 195-205 (1982; Zbl 0526.14011)]). NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEIn the paper under review, a similar result is proved with respect to \textit{isogeny classes} of abelian varieties instead of isomorphism classes. Write \(\Xi_{g,q} = \{\theta(A) : A {\mathbb F}_q{ \text{ up to isogeny}}\}\) and \(\Xi_g = \bigcup_q \Xi_{g,q} \subset \Sigma_g\). Then \(\Xi_g\) is uniformly distributed in \(\Sigma_g\) with respect to the probability measure NEWLINENEWLINE\qquad \(\upsilon_g^{-1} \left(\prod_{j<k} (\cos \pi\theta_j - \cos \pi\theta_k)\right) \prod_i (\sin(\pi\theta_i) d\theta_i)\) NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEwith \(\upsilon_g = (2^g/g!) \prod_{j=1}^g (2j/(2j-1))^{g+1-j}\). The author points out that, together with heuristic arguments due to E. Howe, this would imply uniform distribution of \(\Theta_g\) with respect to a measure different from \(\mu_{ST}\), if \(g > 1\). NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe other main result in the paper is about the number of isogeny classes of abelian varieties (of dimension \(g \geq 2\)) over \({\mathbb F}_q\) with a given number of \({\mathbb F}_q\)-rational points. The author proves that for \(q \to \infty\), this distribution (suitably normalized) tends to a continuous limit measure, which is piecewise given by a polynomial of degree at most \((g-1)(g+2)/2\). For \(g = 2\) and \(g = 3\), these measures are given explicitly. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe proofs build upon results of \textit{S. A. DiPippo} and \textit{E. Howe} [J. Number Theory 73, 426-450 (1998; Zbl 0931.11023), Corrigendum in J. Number Theory 83, 182 (2000)].
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references