No label defined (Q4031813)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 151692
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    No label defined
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 151692

      Statements

      0 references
      12 May 1993
      0 references
      Littlewood-Paley operators
      0 references
      BMO
      0 references
      Marcinkiewicz integral
      0 references
      Campanato space
      0 references
      Lipschitz spaces
      0 references
      Morrey spaces
      0 references
      norm inequality
      0 references
      Poisson integral
      0 references
      Let \(g(f)\), \(g_ \lambda^*(f)\), \(s(f)\) and \(\mu(f)\) be the Littlewood- Paley \(g\) function, \(g_ \lambda^*\) function, the Lusin area function and the Marcinkiewicz integral of \(f\), respectively. Let \({\mathcal E}^{\alpha,p}={\mathcal L}_{p,n+p\alpha}\) be the Campanato space introduced by J. Peetre, which unifies the Lipschitz spaces, BMO and the Morrey spaces. The author gives that for \(1<p<\infty\) and \(- n/p<\alpha<1/2\) \((\alpha\neq 0)\), \(g(f)(x)=\infty\), \((s(f)=\infty)\) a.e., or \(g(f)(x)<\infty\) \((s(f)<\infty)\) a.e. and norm inequality holds. Similar results are given for \(g_ \lambda^*(f)\) and \(\mu(f)\). The case of \(\alpha=0\) (i.e., BMO) has already been treated by Silei Wang, D. S. Kurtz and Y. Han. \(g\) for the case of \(0<\alpha<1\) has been treated by \textit{Shilin Wang} [Ill. J. Math. 33, No. 4, 531-541 (1989; Zbl 0661.42012)] as the author notes. I note that the author's results can be improved for the case of \(s(f)\), \(-n/p<\alpha<1\) as in the case of \(g\). This is proved by using the expression of \[ s(f)(x)=\left(\int_{\{(t,y)\in \mathbb{R}_ +^{n+1};| t| <y\}}y^{1-n}|\nabla f(x-z,y)|^ 2 dz dy\right)^{1/2} \] instead of the one used by Kurtz and the author, and by some modification of their proofs. Here \(f(x,y)\) is the Poisson integral of \(f\). Similar improvements can be made for the other operators.
      0 references

      Identifiers