Metalevel argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- A Logic of Abstract Argumentation
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- Revisiting Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
Cited in
(17)- A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
- A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory
- Computing defeasible meta-logic
- Understanding the abstract dialectical framework
- Arguing about the trustworthiness of the information sources
- Hierarchical Argumentation
- A Logic of Abstract Argumentation
- Foundations for a logic of arguments
- Reasoning about reasoning
- Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
- A flexible approach to argumentation framework analysis using theorem proving
- Instantiating metalevel argumentation frameworks
- Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories
- On Metalogical Relativism
- Expressiveness of SETAFs and support-free ADFs under 3-valued semantics
- Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
This page was built for publication: Metalevel argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3103976)
