On Finite Bases for Weak Semantics: Failures Versus Impossible Futures
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A complete axiomatisation for observational congruence of finite-state behaviours
- A Theory of Communicating Sequential Processes
- Automata, Languages and Programming
- Fair testing
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48630 (Why is no real title available?)
- Impossible futures and determinism
- Liveness, Fairness and Impossible Futures
- Modular construction and partial order semantics of Petri nets
- Nested semantics over finite trees are equationally hard
- Notes on the methodology of CCS and CSP
- On finite alphabets and infinite bases
- On Finite Bases for Weak Semantics: Failures Versus Impossible Futures
- Ready to preorder: an algebraic and general proof
- Ready to Preorder: Get Your BCCSP Axiomatization for Free!
- Ready to preorder: the case of weak process semantics
- Testing equivalences for processes
- The linear time -- branching time spectrum. I: The semantics of concrete, sequential processes.
Cited in
(6)- On the axiomatizability of impossible futures
- On Finite Bases for Weak Semantics: Failures Versus Impossible Futures
- Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures
- Automata, Languages and Programming
- Processes, Terms and Cycles: Steps on the Road to Infinity
- Failures semantics based on interval semiwords is a congruence for refinement
This page was built for publication: On Finite Bases for Weak Semantics: Failures Versus Impossible Futures
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3599070)